Skip to content

Strategy Hypothesis Template

Instructions

Complete this template BEFORE writing any code. A well-formed hypothesis prevents wasted development and provides audit traceability.


Hypothesis Document

1. Strategy Identification

Field Value
Strategy Name
Version 0.1.0
Author
Date YYYY-MM-DD
Status Draft / Under Review / Approved

2. Core Hypothesis

Statement (one sentence):

[Describe the market inefficiency you believe exists and how you will exploit it]

Example:

"Liquidity sweeps below swing lows followed by market structure shifts indicate institutional accumulation, providing high-probability long entries with defined risk."

3. Edge Source

Category Description
Type Microstructure / Technical / Seasonal / Statistical / Other
Mechanism [How does this edge manifest in price?]
Why it exists [Market behavior that creates this opportunity]
Why it persists [Why hasn't it been arbitraged away?]
Decay risk Low / Medium / High

4. Market Applicability

Market Applicable Notes
FX (EUR/USD, GBP/USD, etc.) Yes/No
Crypto (BTC, ETH) Yes/No
Gold/Silver Futures Yes/No
NASDAQ Futures Yes/No

Primary Timeframes: [ ] 1m [ ] 5m [ ] 15m [ ] 1H [ ] 4H [ ] Daily

5. Entry Rules

Setup Conditions (all must be true): 1. 2. 3.

Trigger:

[Specific condition that initiates entry]

Entry Price:

[Market / Limit at X / Stop at X]

6. Exit Rules

Stop Loss:

[How is SL determined? Fixed pips, ATR-based, structure-based?]

Take Profit: | Level | Target | % of Position | |-------|--------|---------------| | TP1 | | | | TP2 | | | | TP3 | | |

Time Exit:

[Max bars in trade? Session close?]

7. Position Sizing

Parameter Value Rationale
Risk per trade %
Max concurrent #
Scaling Yes/No

8. Expected Performance

Metric Expected Minimum Acceptable
Win Rate % %
Avg R:R : :
Sharpe (annual)
Max Drawdown % %
Trades/Month

Basis for Expectations:

[Prior research, similar strategies, theoretical calculation]

9. Assumptions

List all assumptions that must hold for strategy to work:

  1. [ ]
  2. [ ]
  3. [ ]

10. Known Risks

Risk Probability Impact Mitigation
Low/Med/High Low/Med/High

11. Prior Art

Similar Strategies: - [Name/Source]: [How is yours different?]

Academic References: - [Paper/Book]: [Relevant finding]

12. Success Criteria

The hypothesis is VALIDATED if: - [ ] Backtest Sharpe > X on in-sample - [ ] OOS degradation < 30% - [ ] Walk-forward consistency > 60% - [ ] Passes all anti-bias tests

The hypothesis is INVALIDATED if: - [ ] Backtest Sharpe < X - [ ] Max DD > X% in backtest - [ ] Anti-bias tests fail - [ ] Edge disappears with realistic costs

13. Development Plan

Phase Deliverable Duration
1. Prototype Basic signal logic
2. Backtest Full validation
3. Audit Independent review
4. Paper Live paper trading
5. Deploy Production (if approved)

Approval

Role Name Date Signature
Author
Reviewer
Risk Approval

Revision History

Version Date Changes Author
0.1.0 Initial draft